Skip to content

Conversation

krishnangovindraj
Copy link
Member

@krishnangovindraj krishnangovindraj commented Oct 18, 2025

Release notes: product changes

Fix the build pipeline so Mac x86_64 builds are actually built for the x86_64 architecture. They were previously being built targeting the arm64 architecture (the native architecture of the CircleCI executor)

Motivation

Support mac x86_64

Implementation

Plumbing around adding --target x86_64-apple-darwin to npx tauri build

Green run for snapshot deployments: https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/typedb/typedb-studio/1966/workflows/b614b09a-ba5d-467b-b1b5-51628a4dc6c2

Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 18, 2025

Deploy Preview for typedb-studio ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 9dab244
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/typedb-studio/deploys/68f60c4676b7ad0008f8650b
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-888--typedb-studio.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

Comment on lines +117 to +118
git rev-parse HEAD > VERSION
bazel run --define version=$(git rev-parse HEAD) //:deploy-mac-<<parameters.target-arch>>-dmg -- snapshot
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

git rev-parse HEAD > VERSION wouldn't be needed, but i can't get --define version=$(git rev-parse HEAD) to work for whatever reason.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In that case presumably we don't need --define version=$(git rev-parse HEAD) here?

Copy link
Member

@alexjpwalker alexjpwalker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

.

@alexjpwalker alexjpwalker merged commit 383ad32 into typedb:development Oct 20, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants