clean-hwr:0.1.4

[Testspieler09]

I am submitting

• a new package
• an update for a package

Description:

• Addressed that glossary entries were not working in headings.
• further glossary options
• Custom signature labels
• confidentiality notice field

Just out of curiosity, is there a better way of dealing with an empty glossary given by the user, when using the glossarium package?

register-glossary(if glossary.entries != () {glossary.entries} else {((key:"KPI", short: "KPI", long: "Key Performance Indicator"),)})

• ensured that my package is licensed such that users can use and distribute the contents of its template directory without restriction, after modifying them through normal use.

[Testspieler09]

I will add the confidentiality notice (Sperrvermerk) as an optional field to this version.

[elegaanz]

I don't know enough about the glossarium API to answer your question, but if the way you did it works it doesn't seem too bad to me. I'll merge it as it is for now, you can update the call to glossarium in a future release if you find a nicer way to do it.