This and that: 20241024-01 #529
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve updates to several configuration files related to licensing and dependency management. The Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
That is to display test case names, not just dots that don't convey much.
GitHub wasn't able to discover the license (badge) from the LICENSE file. Let's use a vanilla variant for Apache 2.0.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
.github/workflows/test.yamlis excluded by!**/*.yamlpytest.iniis excluded by!**/*.ini
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- LICENSE (1 hunks)
- requirements-dev.txt (1 hunks)
- requirements.txt (0 hunks)
- setup.py (2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- requirements.txt
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- requirements-dev.txt
🔇 Additional comments (2)
setup.py (2)
132-134: LGTM! Python version classifiers are consistent.The classifiers correctly reflect:
- The minimum Python version requirement (>=3.10)
- The CI test matrix mentioned in PR objectives
- Support for PyPy implementation
119-119: Verify codebase compatibility with Python 3.10.The change to support Python 3.10 aligns with the PR objectives. However, we should verify that no Python 3.11+ features are used in the codebase.
#!/bin/bash # Check for Python 3.11+ specific features echo "Checking for Python 3.11+ specific features..." # Look for tomllib (introduced in 3.11) rg -l "import tomllib|from tomllib" # Look for exception groups (introduced in 3.11) rg -l "except\*|ExceptionGroup"
| extras_require={ | ||
| "graphql": ["graphene"], | ||
| "test": ["pytest", "pytest-cov", "pytest-mock", "flask"] | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding additional test dependencies.
The separation of optional features is good, particularly moving graphene to extras. However, the test extras could benefit from additional common testing tools.
Consider adding these common test dependencies:
extras_require={
"graphql": ["graphene"],
- "test": ["pytest", "pytest-cov", "pytest-mock", "flask"]
+ "test": [
+ "pytest",
+ "pytest-cov",
+ "pytest-mock",
+ "pytest-asyncio", # for async tests
+ "pytest-xdist", # for parallel testing
+ "flask",
+ "coverage[toml]" # for coverage config in pyproject.toml
+ ]
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| extras_require={ | |
| "graphql": ["graphene"], | |
| "test": ["pytest", "pytest-cov", "pytest-mock", "flask"] | |
| }, | |
| extras_require={ | |
| "graphql": ["graphene"], | |
| "test": [ | |
| "pytest", | |
| "pytest-cov", | |
| "pytest-mock", | |
| "pytest-asyncio", # for async tests | |
| "pytest-xdist", # for parallel testing | |
| "flask", | |
| "coverage[toml]" # for coverage config in pyproject.toml | |
| ] | |
| }, |
| "starlette[full]", | ||
| "uvicorn[standard]", | ||
| "aiofiles", | ||
| "pyyaml", | ||
| "requests", | ||
| "jinja2", | ||
| "rfc3986", | ||
| "python-multipart", | ||
| "chardet", | ||
| "apispec>=1.0.0b1", | ||
| "marshmallow", | ||
| "whitenoise", | ||
| "docopt", | ||
| "docopt-ng", | ||
| "requests-toolbelt", | ||
| "graphene", | ||
| # "apistar", | ||
| "itsdangerous", | ||
| "apistar", | ||
| "typesystem<0.3", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Critical: Dependencies removed but still in use
The verification reveals a significant issue. The dependencies pyyaml, jinja2, and python-multipart have been removed from setup.py's required dependencies, but they are still actively used in the codebase and are not moved to the extras_require section. This will cause runtime errors as:
yaml(from pyyaml) is used in multiple files including formats.py and schema handlingjinja2is used in core template handling (templates.py) and API functionality- These dependencies are not included in
starlette[full]or moved toextras_require
Required actions:
- Either restore these dependencies to the
install_requireslist - Or update the codebase to remove their usage
- Or move them to appropriate
extras_requiresections with corresponding documentation updates
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider adding version constraints and verify breaking changes.
The dependency changes introduce potential risks:
- Most new dependencies lack version constraints, which could lead to compatibility issues.
- Removal of core dependencies (pyyaml, jinja2, python-multipart) might introduce breaking changes.
Let's verify the impact of removed dependencies:
Consider adding version constraints to prevent future compatibility issues:
required = [
- "starlette[full]",
+ "starlette[full]>=0.28.0",
"uvicorn[standard]",
"aiofiles",
"requests",
"rfc3986",
"chardet",
"apispec>=1.0.0b1",
"marshmallow",
"whitenoise",
- "docopt-ng",
+ "docopt-ng>=0.9.0",
"requests-toolbelt",
- "apistar",
+ "apistar>=0.7.1",
"typesystem<0.3",
]Let me try a different approach to verify the dependencies usage in the codebase.
Dependencies removal requires code changes
The verification shows that the removed dependencies are still actively used in the codebase:
-
yamlis used in:- tests/test_responder.py
- responder/formats.py
- responder/ext/schema/init.py
-
jinja2is used in:- responder/templates.py
- responder/ext/schema/init.py
- responder/api.py
These dependencies cannot be safely removed from setup.py without corresponding code changes, as they are core dependencies used across multiple files. While starlette[full] might include some dependencies, there's no evidence it includes these specific ones.
Let's verify if these dependencies are moved to extras_require section instead:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if removed dependencies are still imported in the codebase
echo "Checking for yaml imports..."
rg -l "import yaml|from yaml"
echo "Checking for jinja2 imports..."
rg -l "import jinja2|from jinja2"
echo "Checking for multipart imports..."
rg -l "import multipart|from multipart"
Length of output: 309
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for imports using ripgrep with proper quoting
echo "Checking for yaml imports..."
rg -l "^(import|from)\s+yaml"
echo -e "\nChecking for jinja2 imports..."
rg -l "^(import|from)\s+jinja2"
echo -e "\nChecking for multipart imports..."
rg -l "^(import|from)\s+multipart"
# Also check for potential usage patterns
echo -e "\nChecking for yaml usage patterns..."
rg -l "yaml\.(safe_)?[a-zA-Z_]+"
echo -e "\nChecking for jinja2 usage patterns..."
rg -l "jinja2\.[a-zA-Z_]+"
echo -e "\nChecking if these are included in starlette[full]..."
rg -l "starlette.*dependencies" requirements*
Length of output: 1032
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if dependencies are moved to extras_require
echo "Checking setup.py for extras_require section..."
rg -A 10 "extras_require\s*=" setup.py
Length of output: 547
| Apache License | ||
| Version 2.0, January 2004 | ||
| http://www.apache.org/licenses/ | ||
|
|
||
| Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software | ||
| distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, | ||
| WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. | ||
| See the License for the specific language governing permissions and | ||
| limitations under the License. | ||
| TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR USE, REPRODUCTION, AND DISTRIBUTION | ||
|
|
||
| 1. Definitions. | ||
|
|
||
| "License" shall mean the terms and conditions for use, reproduction, | ||
| and distribution as defined by Sections 1 through 9 of this document. | ||
|
|
||
| "Licensor" shall mean the copyright owner or entity authorized by | ||
| the copyright owner that is granting the License. | ||
|
|
||
| "Legal Entity" shall mean the union of the acting entity and all | ||
| other entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common | ||
| control with that entity. For the purposes of this definition, | ||
| "control" means (i) the power, direct or indirect, to cause the | ||
| direction or management of such entity, whether by contract or | ||
| otherwise, or (ii) ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of the | ||
| outstanding shares, or (iii) beneficial ownership of such entity. | ||
|
|
||
| "You" (or "Your") shall mean an individual or Legal Entity | ||
| exercising permissions granted by this License. | ||
|
|
||
| "Source" form shall mean the preferred form for making modifications, | ||
| including but not limited to software source code, documentation | ||
| source, and configuration files. | ||
|
|
||
| "Object" form shall mean any form resulting from mechanical | ||
| transformation or translation of a Source form, including but | ||
| not limited to compiled object code, generated documentation, | ||
| and conversions to other media types. | ||
|
|
||
| "Work" shall mean the work of authorship, whether in Source or | ||
| Object form, made available under the License, as indicated by a | ||
| copyright notice that is included in or attached to the work | ||
| (an example is provided in the Appendix below). | ||
|
|
||
| "Derivative Works" shall mean any work, whether in Source or Object | ||
| form, that is based on (or derived from) the Work and for which the | ||
| editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications | ||
| represent, as a whole, an original work of authorship. For the purposes | ||
| of this License, Derivative Works shall not include works that remain | ||
| separable from, or merely link (or bind by name) to the interfaces of, | ||
| the Work and Derivative Works thereof. | ||
|
|
||
| "Contribution" shall mean any work of authorship, including | ||
| the original version of the Work and any modifications or additions | ||
| to that Work or Derivative Works thereof, that is intentionally | ||
| submitted to Licensor for inclusion in the Work by the copyright owner | ||
| or by an individual or Legal Entity authorized to submit on behalf of | ||
| the copyright owner. For the purposes of this definition, "submitted" | ||
| means any form of electronic, verbal, or written communication sent | ||
| to the Licensor or its representatives, including but not limited to | ||
| communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control systems, | ||
| and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the | ||
| Licensor for the purpose of discussing and improving the Work, but | ||
| excluding communication that is conspicuously marked or otherwise | ||
| designated in writing by the copyright owner as "Not a Contribution." | ||
|
|
||
| "Contributor" shall mean Licensor and any individual or Legal Entity | ||
| on behalf of whom a Contribution has been received by Licensor and | ||
| subsequently incorporated within the Work. | ||
|
|
||
| 2. Grant of Copyright License. Subject to the terms and conditions of | ||
| this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual, | ||
| worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable | ||
| copyright license to reproduce, prepare Derivative Works of, | ||
| publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and distribute the | ||
| Work and such Derivative Works in Source or Object form. | ||
|
|
||
| 3. Grant of Patent License. Subject to the terms and conditions of | ||
| this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual, | ||
| worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable | ||
| (except as stated in this section) patent license to make, have made, | ||
| use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer the Work, | ||
| where such license applies only to those patent claims licensable | ||
| by such Contributor that are necessarily infringed by their | ||
| Contribution(s) alone or by combination of their Contribution(s) | ||
| with the Work to which such Contribution(s) was submitted. If You | ||
| institute patent litigation against any entity (including a | ||
| cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that the Work | ||
| or a Contribution incorporated within the Work constitutes direct | ||
| or contributory patent infringement, then any patent licenses | ||
| granted to You under this License for that Work shall terminate | ||
| as of the date such litigation is filed. | ||
|
|
||
| 4. Redistribution. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the | ||
| Work or Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without | ||
| modifications, and in Source or Object form, provided that You | ||
| meet the following conditions: | ||
|
|
||
| (a) You must give any other recipients of the Work or | ||
| Derivative Works a copy of this License; and | ||
|
|
||
| (b) You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices | ||
| stating that You changed the files; and | ||
|
|
||
| (c) You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works | ||
| that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and | ||
| attribution notices from the Source form of the Work, | ||
| excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of | ||
| the Derivative Works; and | ||
|
|
||
| (d) If the Work includes a "NOTICE" text file as part of its | ||
| distribution, then any Derivative Works that You distribute must | ||
| include a readable copy of the attribution notices contained | ||
| within such NOTICE file, excluding those notices that do not | ||
| pertain to any part of the Derivative Works, in at least one | ||
| of the following places: within a NOTICE text file distributed | ||
| as part of the Derivative Works; within the Source form or | ||
| documentation, if provided along with the Derivative Works; or, | ||
| within a display generated by the Derivative Works, if and | ||
| wherever such third-party notices normally appear. The contents | ||
| of the NOTICE file are for informational purposes only and | ||
| do not modify the License. You may add Your own attribution | ||
| notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside | ||
| or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided | ||
| that such additional attribution notices cannot be construed | ||
| as modifying the License. | ||
|
|
||
| You may add Your own copyright statement to Your modifications and | ||
| may provide additional or different license terms and conditions | ||
| for use, reproduction, or distribution of Your modifications, or | ||
| for any such Derivative Works as a whole, provided Your use, | ||
| reproduction, and distribution of the Work otherwise complies with | ||
| the conditions stated in this License. | ||
|
|
||
| 5. Submission of Contributions. Unless You explicitly state otherwise, | ||
| any Contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the Work | ||
| by You to the Licensor shall be under the terms and conditions of | ||
| this License, without any additional terms or conditions. | ||
| Notwithstanding the above, nothing herein shall supersede or modify | ||
| the terms of any separate license agreement you may have executed | ||
| with Licensor regarding such Contributions. | ||
|
|
||
| 6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade | ||
| names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor, | ||
| except as required for reasonable and customary use in describing the | ||
| origin of the Work and reproducing the content of the NOTICE file. | ||
|
|
||
| 7. Disclaimer of Warranty. Unless required by applicable law or | ||
| agreed to in writing, Licensor provides the Work (and each | ||
| Contributor provides its Contributions) on an "AS IS" BASIS, | ||
| WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or | ||
| implied, including, without limitation, any warranties or conditions | ||
| of TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, or FITNESS FOR A | ||
| PARTICULAR PURPOSE. You are solely responsible for determining the | ||
| appropriateness of using or redistributing the Work and assume any | ||
| risks associated with Your exercise of permissions under this License. | ||
|
|
||
| 8. Limitation of Liability. In no event and under no legal theory, | ||
| whether in tort (including negligence), contract, or otherwise, | ||
| unless required by applicable law (such as deliberate and grossly | ||
| negligent acts) or agreed to in writing, shall any Contributor be | ||
| liable to You for damages, including any direct, indirect, special, | ||
| incidental, or consequential damages of any character arising as a | ||
| result of this License or out of the use or inability to use the | ||
| Work (including but not limited to damages for loss of goodwill, | ||
| work stoppage, computer failure or malfunction, or any and all | ||
| other commercial damages or losses), even if such Contributor | ||
| has been advised of the possibility of such damages. | ||
|
|
||
| 9. Accepting Warranty or Additional Liability. While redistributing | ||
| the Work or Derivative Works thereof, You may choose to offer, | ||
| and charge a fee for, acceptance of support, warranty, indemnity, | ||
| or other liability obligations and/or rights consistent with this | ||
| License. However, in accepting such obligations, You may act only | ||
| on Your own behalf and on Your sole responsibility, not on behalf | ||
| of any other Contributor, and only if You agree to indemnify, | ||
| defend, and hold each Contributor harmless for any liability | ||
| incurred by, or claims asserted against, such Contributor by reason | ||
| of your accepting any such warranty or additional liability. | ||
|
|
||
| END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Based on the verification results, I can now provide a final response:
License file needs a copyright notice and NOTICE file consideration
The Apache 2.0 license text is properly formatted, but there are two important items that need attention:
- No copyright notice is present at the top of the LICENSE file. A copyright notice should be added before the Apache License text.
- No NOTICE file exists in the repository. As per section 4(d) of the Apache License, consider creating one if there are any attribution notices that need to be included.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify exact match with official Apache 2.0 license text.
The license appears to be properly formatted and complete. Let's verify it matches the official Apache License 2.0 text exactly.
Let me try another verification approach since the curl command had issues.
This will help verify:
- If a NOTICE file exists as mentioned in section 4(d)
- If there's a copyright notice that should be preserved
- If there are any other license files that need to be considered
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare against official Apache 2.0 license text
# Download official license and compare
curl -s https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt | diff - LICENSE
Length of output: 10755
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there's a NOTICE file in the repository
fd -t f '^NOTICE(\.txt)?$'
# Check if there's any copyright notice at the top of the LICENSE file
head -n 3 LICENSE
# Check if this is the only license file
fd -t f -e md -e txt -i 'licen[cs]e'
Length of output: 137
| distribution, then any Derivative Works that You distribute must | ||
| include a readable copy of the attribution notices contained | ||
| within such NOTICE file, excluding those notices that do not | ||
| pertain to any part of the Derivative Works, in at least one | ||
| of the following places: within a NOTICE text file distributed | ||
| as part of the Derivative Works; within the Source form or | ||
| documentation, if provided along with the Derivative Works; or, | ||
| within a display generated by the Derivative Works, if and | ||
| wherever such third-party notices normally appear. The contents | ||
| of the NOTICE file are for informational purposes only and | ||
| do not modify the License. You may add Your own attribution | ||
| notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside | ||
| or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided | ||
| that such additional attribution notices cannot be construed | ||
| as modifying the License. | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
A NOTICE file is recommended to acknowledge third-party dependencies
The project uses several third-party dependencies that should be acknowledged:
- Starlette (core dependency as mentioned in README)
- Sphinx and related packages (for documentation)
- Uvicorn (for production web server)
- Graphene (for GraphQL support)
- Jinja2 (for templating)
Consider creating a NOTICE file at the repository root to properly acknowledge these dependencies and their respective licenses, ensuring compliance with the Apache License 2.0 Section 4(d).
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider adding a NOTICE file.
Section 4(d) of the license refers to a "NOTICE" text file. Consider adding one if the project includes third-party attributions or specific notices that need to be preserved.
Let me generate additional shell scripts to check for third-party dependencies and attributions that might need to be included in a NOTICE file.
This will help us determine if there are third-party dependencies that might require attribution in a NOTICE file.
Let me check the requirements.txt file to see what third-party dependencies are being used.
This will help us understand what third-party packages are being used and if there are any specific attributions needed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if NOTICE file exists
# Look for NOTICE file in common locations
fd -t f "^NOTICE(\.txt)?$"
Length of output: 10755
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for package manager files that might indicate third-party dependencies
fd -t f "^(package\.json|pom\.xml|build\.gradle|requirements\.txt|Gemfile|go\.mod)$"
# Also check for any existing attribution or third-party notices in docs
rg -i "attribution|third.party|notice" -g "!LICENSE" -g "!*.{lock,min.js}"
Length of output: 5011
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check contents of requirements.txt
cat docs/requirements.txt
# Also check for any README files that might mention dependencies
fd -t f "^README\.(md|rst|txt)$" -x cat {}
Length of output: 4282
About
A few more cleanups and friends, submitted as a bundle of many.
Details